>>195789>I mean the state meddles with the lives of individuals
in other words, your life and my life, our lives. you are talking about possession, rightful possession. you are ascribing the life of an individual to that individual. you arent saying "the state meddles with life", youre saying the state meddles with the lives of (indicating possession and ownership) individuals. if the state had a right to other peoples things then you would not perceive any meddling as having taken place.
>Private property is a product of the state, that is its whole foundation among other things. If things were owned collectively then there would be no ruling party or rulers
no, private property has no reliance on the existence of a state, there are many examples of hunter gatherer cultures having private property. and private property cant be a product of the state and at the same time its foundation, choose one retard. as for collective ownership, im having trouble envisioning what that would look like, could you provide examples?
>No arguments since we aren't on /pol/
sounds like you just dont want to reply. the argument i made is very valid, do you want me to retype it out replacing the word nigger with african?
>So who is a "worthless nigger" in your definition?
i consider criminals worthless niggers, but niggers dont bother me as much as you think. i used the word to illustrate an example, that is, if people create hungry mouths at a rate faster than at which they can be fed, are people morally obligated to give away what they have, even to the point where everyone starves? and this brings up another point, why dont you blame your parents for endowing you with all these needs? they were the ones who forced you into this situation, if anyone has blame for you starving its them, not rich people.
>If someone does something harmful to me then he is committing aggression towards me, this doesn't have anything to do with morals
and what constitutes harm to you? is it when someone punches you in the stomach? or is it when they punch their own stomach? you believe that there is a distinction between what is yours, and not yours, that is private property, that is morality. if yoPost too long. Click here to view the full text.